Evidence Hub

Paracentral acute middle maculopathy following physical exertion: A case report

Owlya N, Beltraminelli T, Montesel A

American journal of ophthalmology case reports, 2026

Abstract

Purpose: To report a case of paracentral acute middle maculopathy (PAMM) after physical exertion and to explore possible underlying microvascular mechanisms.

Observations: A 42-year-old Caucasian man presented with a persistent, unilateral, painless paracentral scotoma that appeared after an intense ski session seven days earlier. His medical history included an 11-year course of migraine with aura and recurrent transient scotomas in either eye, lasting from minutes to days, often triggered by fatigue, exertion, or altitude. At presentation, best-corrected visual acuity was 1.6 Snellen equivalent bilaterally (20/12), with unremarkable slit lamp and fundoscopy examination. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) revealed a focal hyperreflective band in the inner nuclear layer of the right eye, consistent with PAMM. Fundus autofluorescence revealed a hyperautofluorescent spot in the same area. Microperimetry confirmed a localized scotoma in the corresponding area. At follow-up, clinical examination before and after moderate exertion (90 minutes of cycling) showed no new scotomas or clinical abnormalities. However, en face OCT angiography (OCTA) of the deep capillary plexus revealed multifocal variations in capillary density, with some areas demonstrating reduced perfusion after exercise.

Conclusions and importance: PAMM is an OCT finding of focal retinal ischemia associated with various vascular disorders. Migraine has also been reported as a risk factor. In this case, physical…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free