Evidence Hub

Slow Diaphragmatic Breathing for Chronic Migraine Prevention and Treatment: A Case Report

Bentley TGK, D'Andrea-Penna GM, Hightower EL

Reports (MDPI), 2026

Abstract

Background and Clinical Significance: Migraine is a common yet debilitating condition that significantly impacts personal lives, productivity, and the healthcare system. Pharmacological interventions provide relief for some migraine sufferers, but for others, are ineffective or accompanied by side effects. Emerging evidence implicates autonomic nervous system dysfunction in migraine pathophysiology, suggesting that mind-body interventions may offer a simple, cost-free therapeutic option. Case Presentation: A 61-year-old woman presented with severe daily migraines that had persisted for years despite medication and dietary changes. Upon starting a regular 10 min slow diaphragmatic breathing practice, her migraines ceased immediately. At a 12-month follow-up, she had only experienced two minor headaches and reported improvements in both daily functioning and quality of life. Conclusions: These findings underscore the potential role of autonomic imbalance in chronic migraine and the preliminary feasibility of breathing interventions as an accessible, low-risk treatment that may, for some, surpass medication in efficacy. Breathing practices may offer a viable alternative to pharmaceutical interventions that benefits both patients and healthcare systems alike.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free