Evidence Hub

Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis presented as a migraine headache with normal D-dimer: a case report and literature review

Shweliya MA, Hamzah KA, Kurmaha YH, Mathew KT, Alsaadany KR, Eladl HH, Mahgoub AMA, Amer Y et al.

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026

Abstract

Introduction: Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis (SSST) is a rare type of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), characterized by blood clot formation in the superior sagittal sinus, leading to increased intracranial pressure. This report highlights a case of SSST presenting atypically as a migraine with normal D-dimer levels, emphasizing the need for thorough evaluation despite normal laboratory results in at-risk individuals.

Presentation: A 49-year-old female experienced a severe unilateral headache, photophobia, dizziness, and neck tension. She had a history of migraines and hypertension. The patient was a heavy smoker and used combined oral contraceptives. Examination revealed neck stiffness and a blood pressure of 150/90 mmHg. Computed tomography and D-dimer tests were normal. Magnetic resonance venography (MRV) revealed SSST and a lacunar infarction. Anticoagulation was initiated, resulting in a good recovery and discharge after 11 days.

Discussion: This case illustrates the difficult diagnostic challenge caused by SSST, which initially presented as a primary headache disorder. The occurrence of red flags, including an unusual headache pattern and neck stiffness, justified further investigation. The article also considers the limitations of using D-dimer as a rule-out test in high-suspicion cases, the absolute diagnostic value of MRV, and the effectiveness of standard anticoagulation therapy.

Conclusions: This case serves as a reminder that clinical judgment should…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free