Evidence Hub

Reversible Cerebral Vasoconstriction Syndrome Presenting with Hemorrhage and Delayed Cerebral Abscess: A Rare Clinical Progression

Mekler J, Nulle J, Nigam T, Weil E

The Neurohospitalist, 2026

Abstract

We present the case of a 32-year-old woman who developed recurrent thunderclap headaches, initially misattributed to migraine, ultimately diagnosed as reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) based on multifocal arterial narrowing and clinical presentation. Her course was complicated by right occipital intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) and later by formation of a cerebral abscess at the prior hemorrhagic site. Cultures revealed methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus without a clear systemic infectious source; dermatologic seeding was suspected. This case highlights two uncommon features: an RCVS-related ICH complicated by abscess formation and the absence of typical infectious risk factors. The pathophysiology was hypothesized to involve hematogenous spread in the context of transient blood-brain barrier disruption following hemorrhage. While RCVS typically has favorable outcomes, this case underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis in patients with evolving symptoms and neuroimaging findings. To our knowledge, this represents a rare instance of spontaneous abscess development at the site of RCVS-related hemorrhage in an immunocompetent individual.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free