Chronic migraine. case report.
Abstract
We report a case of a 40-year-old male who had the clinical signs of chronic migraine. The diagnosis of chronic migraine is based on International Headache Society diagnostic criteria. The patient was bothered by unilateral and localized pain in the frontotemporal and ocular area, which lasts 4-72 hours, sensitivity to light and sound. Headache has pulsating quality, moderate or severe pain intensity. Attacks of headache bothered about 15-20 days a month. According to the standard MR scanning protocol, single areas of increased MR signal were detected in the mode Т2, Flair, which do not limit diffusion and do not cause a change in the MR signal in the SWI mode. The foci are located subcortically in the white matter of the frontal lobes of the brain, corresponding to foci of gliosis of the white matter of the frontal lobes. The patient received antiepileptic drugs, β-Blockers, triptans, antidepressants.The patient is recommended to inject botulinum toxin.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Calcium Ions in the Physiology and Pathology of the Central Nervous System
- AI-powered in silico twins: redefining precision medicine through simulation, personalization, and predictive healthcare
- In silico functional, structural and pathogenicity analysis of missense single nucleotide polymorphisms in human MCM6 gene
- In Silico drug repurposing pipeline using deep learning and structure based approaches in epilepsy
- Targeting serotonin receptors with phytochemicals – an in-silico study
- In silico exploration of anti-prostate cancer compounds from differential expressed genes
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.