Evidence Hub

Efficacy and safety of post-mastectomy radiation therapy for patients with breast cancer after breast reconstruction: A retrospective multicenter cohort study (Reborn-03)

Wakako Tsuji, S. Sasada, Noriyuki Watanabe, S. Tomita, Ayaka Koike-Shimo, N. Uehiro, T. Tsukioki, N. Nagura et al.

Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2025

1,138 participants

Abstract

579

Background:

A cornerstone of multidisciplinary treatment for breast cancer, breast reconstruction has recently been extended to high-risk patients with breast cancer who require post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT). PMRT reduces the 10-year risk of locoregional recurrence; however, its association with postoperative complications remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PMRT in patients with high-risk breast cancer who underwent breast reconstruction.

Methods:

This retrospective cohort study included patients with high-risk breast cancer who underwent immediate or delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy between 2008 and 2018. High-risk patients were defined as those with positive axillary lymph nodes, clinical tumor size of >5 cm, chest wall invasion, or skin invasion. Patient data were collected from participating institutions and analyzed retrospectively.

Results:

Of the 1,138 patients, 427 (37.5%) underwent PMRT and 711 (62.5%) did not. The median age at surgery was 46 years (range, 23–76years), and the median follow-up period was 8 years. The number of patients meeting more than two high-risk criteria was 149 (23.9%) and 81 (11.4%) in the PMRT and non-PMRT cohorts, respectively. Breast reconstruction using silicone breast implants (SBI) was performed in 70% and 71.4% of patients in the PMRT and non-PMRT cohorts, respectively. The locoregional recurrence rates were 7.7% and 12.7% in the PMRT and non-PMRT cohorts, respectively…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 1,138 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free