Evidence Hub

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Dupilumab in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: A 7-Year Population-based Cohort Study

Chuan-Yen Sun, Y. Tesfaigzi, Gin-Yi Lee, Y. Chen, Scott T. Weiss, Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma

Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2024

15 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previous randomized controlled trials had established the efficacy of dupilumab among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with triple therapy over 52 weeks of follow-up.

OBJECTIVE

This population-based cohort study aimed to explore the long-term clinical effectiveness of dupilumab in COPD patients.

METHODS

This population-based cohort study included U.S. patients with COPD between April 2017 and August 2024. Patients initiating dupilumab and therapies that incorporated long-acting β2-agonists (LABA) inhalers were included. Patients with asthma or lung cancer were excluded. The risk of outcomes after the initiation of dupilumab versus LABA-containing therapies was measured. For detailed Methods, please see the Methods section in this article's Online Repository at www.jacionline.org.

RESULTS

A total of 1,521 dupilumab initiators and 1,521 propensity score-matched patients receiving LABA-based therapies were included. Dupilumab recipients were associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR:0.53, 95% CI:0.43-0.65), emergency visits (HR:0.78, 95% CI:0.69-0.89), and acute exacerbation (AE) rates (HR:0.59, 95% CI:0.53-0.65). Dupilumab was also associated with reductions in the requirement of short-acting β2-agonists (HR:0.48, 95% CI:0.43-0.52), short-acting muscarinic antagonists (HR:0.43, 95% CI:0.37-0.49) for symptoms control. Additionally, dupilumab decreased subsequent pneumonia (HR:0.65, 95% CI:0.50-0.86), and COPD-relevant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free