Evidence Hub

3D Technology-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery for the treatment of primary brainstem hemorrhage: A prospective cohort study

Ming Wei, Quan Chen, Xiu Yang, Xiaofeng Zhu, Xiangyang Tian, Qiang Tong, Qiu Han

World Neurosurgery, 2024

30 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess the therapeutic efficacy of minimally invasive puncture and drainage (MIPD) facilitated by a three-dimensional (3D)-printed guide plate in the management of primary brainstem hemorrhage (PBH).

METHODS

This single-center, prospective cohort study enrolled 30 PBH patients who underwent MIPD guided by 3D printing technology and 30 PBH patients who received conservative treatment, serving as the control cohort. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of 1 and 2 at 30 days post-discharge. Secondary endpoints included hematoma volume at admission and post-treatment, incidence of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and/or rebleeding, in-hospital mortality rate, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

The treatment cohort demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of patients with mRS scores of 1 and 2 at 30 days post-discharge compared to the control cohort. Conversely, the treatment cohort exhibited significantly lower postoperative hematoma volumes, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores, HAP incidence, in-hospital mortality, and hospital stay duration than the control cohort. However, no significant difference in rebleeding incidence was observed between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

MIPD guided by 3D printing technology is more effective than conservative treatment in PBH cases without extensive hemorrhage. This approach can alleviate hematoma pressure…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 30 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free