Evidence Hub

Severe community-acquired pneumonia complicated by co-infection with Chlamydia psittaci and ESBL-producing Escherichia coli: a case report

Cheng-Bin Lu, Tian-Jian Xie, Ben-Mo Xu, Yuan-Xia Li, Yu-Rui Yang

BMC Infectious Diseases, 2026

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci

is an uncommon but potentially severe cause of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), typically associated with exposure to birds. Co-infection with multidrug-resistant bacteria is rare and may complicate clinical management.

We report the case of a 71-year-old man with long-term pigeon exposure who presented with high fever, cough, and purulent sputum. He rapidly progressed to severe CAP, type I respiratory failure, and sepsis. Initial routine microbiological tests were negative. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) detected

C. psittaci

, and sputum culture grew extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing

Escherichia coli

(ESBL-EC). Initial empiric therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam and doxycycline failed to control the disease. After treatment adjustment guided by mNGS and antimicrobial susceptibility testing, including piperacillin–tazobactam, doxycycline, and levofloxacin, combined with respiratory support and organ protection, the patient improved and was discharged.

This case highlights the importance of considering mixed infections, including drug-resistant bacteria, in severe CAP patients with avian exposure who fail empiric therapy. mNGS is a valuable tool for rapid etiological diagnosis in such complex cases. In addition, detection of multidrug-resistant organisms in respiratory samples should be interpreted cautiously, considering colonization, clinical correlation, and therapeutic response.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free