Evidence Hub

Efficacy and cardiovascular safety of lasmiditan in patients with cardiovascular risk factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis with updated synthesis of triptan safety data

Biswas S, Vasireddy S, Srivastava Y, Gehlot D, Fasil C, Natarajan HA, Reza IMK, Youn J et al.

Headache, 2026

5,126 participants

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate lasmiditan efficacy and cardiovascular (CV) safety in patients with CV risk factors, and provide an updated synthesis of observational evidence on long-term triptan-related CV outcomes.

Background: Approximately 20% of patients with migraine have CV contraindications to triptans. Lasmiditan, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1F receptor agonist without vasoconstrictive properties, may offer a safer alternative to triptans for these patients.

Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to June 2025 following a retrospectively registered International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews protocol (CRD420251208584). Primary outcomes were pain freedom at 2 h (efficacy; randomized controlled trials) and major adverse CV events (observational studies). Random-effects meta-analyses used odds ratios (ORs) for binary efficacy outcomes and hazard ratios for time-to-event safety data. Rare cardiac adverse events were analyzed using Peto ORs. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework.

Results: Sixteen studies were included (six lasmiditan studies involving three randomized controlled trials [two phase 3 and one phase 2] enrolling 5126 participants, two post hoc analyses, one open-label extension, and 10 triptan CV safety studies). In the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 5,126 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free