Evidence Hub

Effect of early pulmonary rehabilitation therapy on the pulmonary function of patients with stroke-associated pneumonia and analysis of its effectiveness

Zhan Liao, Fei-Wei Liao

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 2024

8 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) treatment methods for stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP). Methods: This is a prospective, randomized controlled intervention study. Eighty SAP patients admitted to the rehabilitation department of Liuzhou People’s Hospital from June 2020 to December 2021 were selected and divided into an intervention group (40 cases) and a control group (40 cases) using the random number table approach. Patients in both groups received conventional treatments. Patients in the intervention group received early PR interventions, while patients in the control group received conventional rehabilitation treatment. The clinical effectiveness and pulmonary function indexes were compared. Results: The intervention group showed shorter durations of stay in the intensive care unit, relief from symptoms, and mechanical ventilation compared to the control group following treatment (P < 0.05). The total clinical efficacy after intervention in the treatment group was 82.50%, significantly higher than the control group’s rate of 47.50% (P < 0.05). After 21 days of treatment, the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)/predicted value in the intervention group was 64.92 ± 8.53, while it was 52.69 ± 7.08 in the other group. The FEV1/forced vital capacity in the intervention group was 59.73 ± 7.18, compared to 50.36 ± 6.54 in the control group. The intervention group had a clinical pulmonary…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free