Evidence Hub

Migraine biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Robin M. van Dongen, Ronald Zielman, Marek J. Noga, Olaf M. Dekkers, Thomas Hankemeier, Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg, Gisela Marie Terwindt, Michel D. Ferrari

Cephalalgia, 2016

150 citations

Abstract

Objective To perform a meta-analysis of migraine biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and of corresponding blood concentrations. Methods We conducted a systematic search for studies that measured biochemical compounds in CSF of chronic or episodic migraineurs and non-headache controls. Subsequent searches retrieved studies with blood measurements of selected CSF biomarkers. If a compound was assessed in three or more studies, results were pooled in a meta-analysis with standardised mean differences (SMD) as effect measures. Results Sixty-two compounds were measured in 40 CSF studies. Most important results include: increased glutamate (five studies, SMD 2.22, 95% CI: 1.30, 3.13), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) (three studies, SMD: 3.80, 95% CI: 3.19, 4.41) and nerve growth factor (NGF) (three studies, SMD: 6.47, 95% CI: 5.55, 7.39) in chronic migraine patients and decreased β-endorphin (β-EP) in both chronic (four studies, SMD: -1.37, 95% CI: -1.80, -0.94) and interictal episodic migraine patients (three studies, SMD: -1.12, 95% CI: -1.65, -0.58). In blood, glutamate (interictal) and CGRP (chronic, interictal and ictal) were increased and β-EP (chronic, interictal and ictal) was decreased. Conclusions Glutamate, β-EP, CGRP and NGF concentrations are altered in CSF and, except for NGF, also in blood of migraineurs. Future research should focus on the pathophysiological roles of these compounds in migraine.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free