Evidence Hub

Case Report: Mechanical thrombectomy of cerebral venous sinuses using the NeVa stent retriever

Peña Giraldo ME, Tascon Barona AH, Granados Sánchez AM, Folleco EA

Frontiers in radiology, 2026

Abstract

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) accounts for less than 1% of cerebrovascular events worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity; in severe or anticoagulation-refractory cases, mechanical thrombectomy is considered, yet no consensus exists on optimal device selection. We report the case of a 32-year-old woman with a history of migraine and oral contraceptive use who presented with sudden-onset headache on awakening, disorientation, and right hemiparesis, followed by focal seizures and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) progression from 3 to 7. Magnetic resonance venography confirmed extensive CVST involving the superior sagittal sinus and bilateral transverse and sigmoid sinuses. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed on hospital day 1 via a right jugular approach using a combined aspiration and NeVa stent retriever (5.5 × 37 mm) technique with a 6-second integration time; after six passes, near-complete recanalization of the superior sagittal sinus was achieved with restoration of antegrade venous drainage and no intraprocedural complications. The post-procedural course included neurological improvement (Medical Research Council grade 4/5) and secondary intracranial hypertension (opening pressure 33 cmH₂O), which was managed conservatively. The patient was discharged after 12 days of hospitalization, with a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 at the 34-day follow-up visit. To our knowledge, this represents the first report of off-label NeVa…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free