Evidence Hub

Vitamin D Deficiency and Supplementation in Migraine: A Scoping Review of Clinical Efficacy, Evidence Gaps, and Research Priorities

Marathe A, Vaghasiya S, Shah A, Desai S

Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 2026

14 participants

Abstract

Background and objectives: Migraine is a debilitating neurological disorder affecting 10%-20% of the global population, with significant socioeconomic burdens. Vitamin D deficiency, prevalent in over 1 billion individuals, has been proposed as a modifiable risk factor in migraine management due to its potential role in pain modulation and neuroinflammation. This scoping review aimed to map global vitamin D deficiency prevalence across migraine subtypes and geographic regions, synthesize clinical correlations between vitamin D status and migraine characteristics, and explore heterogeneity in therapeutic evidence across paediatric, chronic, and refractory migraine subgroups.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted, identifying 3,447 records initially. After screening and eligibility assessment, 30 studies were included. These encompassed observational studies (n = 14), randomized controlled trials (n = 9), and systematic reviews (n = 7). Data were synthesized narratively due to clinical heterogeneity and the predominance of cross sectional evidence.

Results: Vitamin D deficiency (serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] 40°N: 75%-90%). Inverse correlations were observed between vitamin D levels and headache frequency and disability scores. High dose vitamin D supplementation (≥50,000 IU/week) reduced migraine attacks by 50%-72% in deficient adults, while minimal benefit was seen in replete individuals. Single trials revealed enhanced efficacy when…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 14 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free