Evidence Hub

Sexually Dimorphic Neuroimmune Pathways in Chronic Pain: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms

Brezic N, Gligorevic S, Sič A, Tseriotis VS, Knezevic NN

Biomolecules, 2026

3 citations

Abstract

Chronic pain is a highly prevalent and disabling condition with a well-documented female predominance in incidence, severity and persistence. These sex differences are driven by sexually dimorphic neuroimmune mechanisms rather than psychosocial factors alone. This systematic review was conducted to comprehensively synthesize human clinical and translational evidence on sex-specific neuroimmune and glial cell pathways underlying chronic pain. Scientific literature was systematically searched from database inception to December 2025 across multiple biomedical databases to identify relevant clinical and translational studies. Across pain conditions, convergent evidence demonstrated that chronic pain mechanisms diverge by sex at cellular and molecular levels. Male-predominant pathways were characterized by microglial activation, particularly P2X4 receptor-mediated signaling and brain-derived neurotrophic factor-dependent neuronal disinhibition, supported by neuroimaging, transcriptomic, and pharmacological data. In contrast, female-predominant mechanisms involved adaptive immune processes, including CD4+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration, pannexin-1-dependent leptin release, chemokine signaling, and astrocyte-mediated neuroimmune crosstalk. Sex-specific cytokine and chemokine profiles, differential glial activation patterns, and divergent neuroimmune-endocrine interactions further distinguished pain pathways between males and females. Despite consistent mechanistic trends,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free