Evidence Hub

Risk of suicidal behaviors following sport-related and non-sport-related concussion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liao M, Hu E, Liu K

BMC psychiatry, 2025

13,483,226 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the strength of association between a history of concussion and the spectrum of suicidal behaviors, including Suicidal Ideation, Made a Suicide Plan, Attempted Suicide, and Death by Suicide. It also sought to provide the first direct comparison of suicide risk associated with sport-related concussion (SRC) versus non-sport-related concussion (non-SRC) and to examine the moderating role of sex.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guidelines, this study was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251074749). A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases was conducted through August 2025. Observational studies reporting on the association between a history of concussion and at least one suicidal behavior outcome were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the context of injury (SRC vs. non-SRC) and sex.

Results: A total of 18 studies, comprising 13,483,226 participants (of whom 650,465 had a history of concussion), were included. The meta-analysis revealed that a history of concussion was significantly associated with an increased risk for all suicidal behavior outcomes: Suicidal Ideation (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.20-1.52), Made a Suicide Plan (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.20-1.51), Attempted Suicide (OR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.43-1.94), and Death by Suicide (OR…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 13,483,226 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free