Evidence Hub

Association between waist-to-height ratio and headache symptoms in U.S. youth: A nationwide cross-sectional study

Lei X, Wang L, He R, Jiang Z

Obesity research & clinical practice, 2025

8,915 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), a marker of central adiposity, and the odds of frequent or severe headaches, including migraines, in U.S. children and adolescents.

METHODS: We analyzed 8915 participants aged 8-19 years in the 1999-2004 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). WHtR was calculated as waist circumference divided by height and scaled by 10 to reflect the effect of a 0.1-unit increase. We applied survey-weighted logistic regression models to estimate associations between WHtR and self-reported headache status, adjusting for demographic, metabolic, and behavioral covariates. Additional interaction and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess effect modification and robustness.

RESULTS: Each 0.1-unit increase in WHtR was associated with a 26 % higher odds of reporting headaches (OR = 1.26, 95 % CI: 1.15, 1.38; p < 0.001). Compared to the lowest quartile (Q1), participants in the highest quartile (Q4) had 34 % greater odds (OR = 1.34, 95 % CI: 1.06, 1.70). Restricted cubic spline models demonstrated a linear dose-response association (p for nonlinearity = 0.96). The association remained robust across multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION: WHtR was linearly associated with the odds of frequent or severe headaches in U.S. youth. Although the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, WHtR may serve as a simple and developmentally stable marker for identifying obesity-related neurological…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 8,915 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free