Evidence Hub

GIANT: a prospective, multicenter, real-world study on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of atogepant in migraine patients with multiple therapeutic failures

P. Barbanti, G. Egeo, Francesca Pistoia, C. Aurilia, Paola Scatena, Steno Rinalduzzi, S. Strumia, Antonio Salerno et al.

The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2025

183 participants · 25 citations

Abstract

Atogepant, the first oral CGRP receptor antagonist approved for migraine prevention, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in randomized clinical trials (RCT). However, prospective real-world data are lacking. To explore the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of atogepant 60 mg at week 12 in patients with high-frequency episodic (HFEM: 8-14 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM) with multiple therapeutic failures. This ongoing, multicenter (n = 16), prospective real-world study included consecutive adults with HFEM or CM who had failed ≥3 prior preventive treatments, according to AIFA criteria. Participants received atogepant 60 mg daily, with treatment planned for up to 12 months. Primary endpoint: change from baseline to week 12 in monthly migraine days (MMD) for HFEM and monthly headache days (MHD) for CM. Secondary endpoints: changes in monthly analgesic intake (MAI), pain intensity (NRS), disability (HIT-6, MIDAS), interictal burden (MIBS-4), treatment satisfaction (PGIC), responder rates (≥ 50%, ≥ 75%, 100%), and changes in migraine frequency during the first treatment week compared to the last pre-treatment week. Adverse events were monitored throughout. A total of 183 patients were enrolled and 82 completed ≥ 12 weeks of follow-up. Of these, 41.5% had previously failed anti-CGRP mAbs. At week 12, significant reductions (p < 0.001) were observed in MMD (–6.0) and MHD (–11.2). Secondary outcomes also improved significantly (p < 0.001): MAI (–10.9), NRS (–2.7), HIT-6…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 183 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free