Evidence Hub

Comparing screening tests for pharyngeal dysphagia in stroke patients

Elham Moamen, Mohammed Hussin Badreldin, Enas A. Hassan, E. Hashish

The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 2026

58 participants

Abstract

Screening for oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in stroke patients is necessary as OPD is a major cause for aspiration pneumonia, nutritional imbalance, and dehydration. it has a poor prognosis and a high mortality rate. This study focused on pharyngeal dysphagia, as it can lead to aspiration pneumonia, which is considered the most serious complication of OPD. Furthermore, the pharyngeal phase is an internal process that cannot be observed during bedside examinations, also the pharyngeal muscles’ function, unlike that of the oral muscles, cannot be examined to predict the efficacy of the pharyngeal phase. Therefore, identifying the highly accurate screening test for pharyngeal dysphagia will prevent misdiagnosis, improve patients’ management, and reduce costs of unnecessary instrumental procedures. This study aimed to compare the screening accuracy of the Volume Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST), Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS) and 3 Ounce Water Swallow test (3 Ounce WST) in detecting pharyngeal dysphagia (PD) in stroke patients for better management and outcomes. A cross-sectional analytic study was conducted in the Phoniatrics Unit of the Otolaryngology Department and the Neurology Unit of the Neuropsychiatry Department. A total of 58 stroke patients were recruited and subjected to the Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test, Gugging Swallowing Screen, 3-ounce Water Swallow Test and Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing. A total of 58 stroke patients participated in this study.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 58 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free