Evidence Hub

Trigeminal nerve microstructure is linked with neuroinflammation and brainstem activity in migraine

Sarasa Tohyama, Michael Datko, L. Brusaferri, Lillian D Kinder, Jack H. Schnieders, Mackenzie Hyman, Alison M. Goldstein, Melaina Gilbert et al.

Brain : a journal of neurology, 2025

60 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

Although the pathophysiology of migraine involves a complex ensemble of peripheral and CNS changes that remain incompletely understood, the activation and sensitization of the trigeminovascular system are believed to play a major role. However, non-invasive, in vivo neuroimaging studies investigating the underlying neural mechanisms of trigeminal system abnormalities in human migraine patients are limited. Here, we studied 60 patients with migraine (55 females, mean ± standard deviation age: 36.28 ± 11.95 years) and 20 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (19 females, age: 35.45 ± 13.30 years) using ultra-high field 7 T diffusion tensor imaging and functional MRI, in addition to PET with the translocator protein ligand 11C-PBR28. We evaluated MRI diffusivity measures and the PET signal at the trigeminal nerve root, in addition to the brainstem functional MRI response to innocuous ophthalmic trigeminal nerve territory stimulation. Patients with migraine demonstrated altered white matter microstructure at the trigeminal nerve root (n = 53), including reduced fractional anisotropy, in comparison to healthy controls (n = 18). Furthermore, in patients, lower fractional anisotropy was accompanied by higher neuroinflammation (i.e. elevated 11C-PBR28 PET signal) at the nerve root (n = 36) and by lower functional MRI activation in an ipsilateral pontine cluster consistent with the spinal trigeminal nucleus (n = 51). These findings were more robust on the right side, which was…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free