Evidence Hub

Effectiveness and tolerability of liraglutide as add-on treatment in patients with obesity and high-frequency or chronic migraine: A prospective pilot study

S. Braca, C. Russo, A. Stornaiuolo, G. Cretella, A. Miele, Caterina Giannini, R. De Simone

Headache, 2025

31 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists could serve as a novel prophylactic treatment for migraine in patients with obesity.

BACKGROUND: Increased intracranial pressure (ICP) is speculated to play a role in migraine mechanisms, as chronic migraine and idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema (IIWHOP) are often clinically indistinguishable. These striking similarities suggest a deep pathogenetic link between the two conditions posing the hypothesis that control of ICP may be helpful in migraine treatment. The GLP-1R agonists have been shown to greatly reduce ICP. Notably, they have also been demonstrated to decrease calcitonin gene-related peptide expression in chronic migraine models.

METHODS: This was a prospective, interventional, open-label, pilot cohort study, evaluating the effectiveness of liraglutide as an add-on treatment of unresponsive migraine in patients with obesity. We consecutively enrolled patients with high-frequency or chronic migraine and a body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m2, and unresponsive to at least two preventive treatments. We excluded patients with papilledema, sixth nerve palsy, or pulsatile tinnitus, to rule out patients in which idiopathic intracranial hypertension could be clinically suspected. Liraglutide was administered 1.2 mg daily. The study was conducted from January to July 2024, with a 12-week follow-up period. The primary outcome of this study was the reduction of monthly days…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free