Evidence Hub

Impaired glymphatic function contributes to high-frequency attacks in patients with episodic migraine

Xin Cai, Wei Sun, Mengfei Cai, Da-Wei Li, Zhenzhen Chen, Hao Li, Bo Yuan, Yan Li et al.

The Journal of Headache and Pain, 2025

74 participants · 14 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have reported inconsistent results regarding glymphatic function in migraine patients. This study aimed to investigate glymphatic function in patients with episodic migraine (EM), focusing on varying attack frequencies, and to explore its potential pathophysiologic role in migraine.

METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, migraine clinical parameters and psychiatric comorbidities, including depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders, were collected. Three MRI measures were quantified, i.e., the diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS) index, perivascular space (PVS) volume in the basal ganglia (BG) and white matter (WM), and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume in the periventricular WM and deep WM. Patients with 4 or more monthly migraine days (MMDs) were categorized into the high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM) group, whereas patients with fewer than 4 MMDs were placed in the low-frequency episodic migraine (LFEM) group. The differences in the DTI-ALPS index, PVS volume, and WMH volume were compared between the controls and patients with EM, as well as among the EM subgroups. Correlations between the DTI-ALPS index and migraine clinical parameters, WMH, and PVS were determined.

RESULTS: A total of 74 patients with EM without cardiovascular risk factors and 42 age- and sex-matched controls were enrolled. The HFEM group (1.37 ± 0.12) exhibited a significantly lower DTI-ALPS index compared to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 74 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free