Evidence Hub

Pelvic infections with intrauterine device: microbiological profile and clinical significance

H. Suhail

Reproductive health of woman, 2025

162 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are widely used long-acting method of reversible contraception which has a high efficacy and safety. Around the world, about 22.8% of women use IUDs for birth control. However, the use of these devices is highly associated with an increased risk of pelvic inflammatory diseases, potentially leading to significant health complications.The objective: to identify the prevalence of bacterial microorganisms in endocervical swabs from women using IUDs and assess the antibiotic sensitivity profiles of these isolates.Materials and methods. This research is a cross-sectional study starting from June 2022 and ending in June 2024. Both written and verbal consents of 162 women aged 18–48 years who used IUDs as a contraceptive method and attended the private gynecology clinic and Al-Zahrawi hospital in Mosul city, Iraq were provided. Endocervical vaginal swabs were taken and diagnosed by Gram staining method, biochemical testing, and the VITEK 2 system for bacterial identification. Antibiotic sensitivity was assessed using automated methods.Results. Among the 162 participants, 90 (55.56%) women had negative culture results, while 72 (44.44%) patients had positive results. Escherichia coli was the predominant microorganism (17.28%), followed by Klebsiella spp. (6.79%) and Staphylococcus aureus (7.41%). Antibiotic sensitivity test has revealed that meropenem, imipenem, levofloxacin, and colistin were the most effective medications, showing 100% sensitivity. Other…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 162 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free