Evidence Hub

Effectiveness of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies and onabotulinumtoxinA in menstrually-related migraine: The unmet need of perimenstrual headache days

Rut Mas-de-les-Valls, Laura Gómez-Dabó, E. Caronna, V. Gallardo, A. Alpuente, M. Torres-Ferrús, P. Pozo-Rosich

Cephalalgia, 2025

13 citations

Abstract

Background Data on the effectiveness of preventive treatments on menstrually-related migraine (MRM) is scarce. Our objective was to analyze the efficacy of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) and onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) in the reduction of perimenstrual headache days (PHD) and perimenstrual migraine days (PMD) compared to non-perimenstrual headache days (non-PHD) and non-perimenstrual migraine days (non-PMD) per month in women with MRM. Methods A retrospective study was conducted including females with menstruation and headache records, treated with either anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A. Patients completed e-Diary one month before and three months after preventive treatment. We collected clinical data and analyzed PHD/PMD and non-PHD/non-PMD before and after treatment. Additional analyses included PHD/PMD and non-PHD/non-PMD comparisons grouped by aura, episodic/chronic migraine, treatment and contraceptive intake. Results We analyzed data from 113 females with a median (range) age of 39.0 (33.0–45.0) years. When combining patients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs or BTX-A, a median (range) of 2.0 (2.0–3.0) PHD/month (corresponding to 13.6% baseline monthly headache days (MHD)) and 13.0 (9.0–17.0) non-PHD/month pre-treatment was observed. From these, 2.0 (1.0–3.0) were PMD/month, and 7.0 (4.0–11.0) were non-PMD/month. After treatment, the median PHD/month was 2.0 (1.0–3.0) (corresponding to 16.67% of MHD) (p = 0.085), and 8.0 (5.0–13.0) were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free