Evidence Hub

Antibiotic Use and Prescribing Patterns for Respiratory Tract Infections (ICD-10: J00-J99) in Indonesia During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Misworo Misworo, I. Kusuma, Khamdiyah Indah Kurniasih, Fiqih Nurkholis, Fauziah Fauziah

Journal of Pharmacy and Science, 2025

2,395 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Introduction: Respiratory tract infections (RTIs) contribute substantially to global antibiotic consumption, raising concerns about antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This study aimed to analyze antibiotic prescribing patterns for respiratory disorders in an Indonesian teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined systemic antibiotic prescriptions based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Classification (ATC: J01) for respiratory diseases (ICD-10: J00-J99) at Cilacap Government Teaching Hospital between January and December 2021. Data were extracted from electronic medical records (e-MR), including patient demographics (i.e. age and sex), ICD codes and name of antibiotics. We analyzed WHO AWaRe classifications, administration routes, and seasonal patterns based on patient’s entry and antibiotic use. Results: The study included 2,395 patients with antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory disorders. The Watch group antibiotics accounted for 85.6% of prescriptions, with the highest use among adults (86.2%). Parenteral administration (71.5%) was more common than oral administration (28.5%). Pneumonia (38.2%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (27%) were the most common indications. Antibiotic use peaked in December (n=529) and was lowest in July (n=84). Ceftriaxone (n=838), azithromycin (n=270), cefixime (n=262), levofloxacin (n=216), and meropenem (n=56) were among the top prescribed antibiotics. Conclusion: The study…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 2,395 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free