Evidence Hub

A Prospective, Double-blind, Sham-controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the Mi-Helper Device for Acute Treatment of Migraine in an At Home Setting

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2025

156 participants

Abstract

This is a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized, decentralized trial. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of the Mi-Helper transnasal cooling device for acute treatment of migraine in an at home setting.

Adults aged 18 years to 70 years old with a diagnosis of migraine (with or without aura) for at least one year will be recruited for this study.

Conditions: Migraine With or Without Aura, Migraine, Migraine Headache.

Primary outcome: Pain Freedom at 2 Hours Post Treatment.

Enrollment: 156 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 156 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free