Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety Outcomes of CAR T-Cell Therapies in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Who Received Prior Treatment with Mosunetuzumab

Adam Braun, S. Schuster, L. Nastoupil, N. Bartlett, M. Shadman, Anita Kumar, D. Tzachanis, D. Chihara et al.

Blood, 2024

26 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Mosunetuzumab is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific antibody that is being evaluated in patients with select B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) histologies in a Phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02500407). Mosunetuzumab is approved by the FDA and EMA for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. A key emerging question is the optimal treatment sequence of mosunetuzumab and CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, and whether CAR T-cell therapies remain clinically active post mosunetuzumab treatment. Previous data are limited but have shown that the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapies is preserved in patients with B-NHL who progressed following treatment with bispecific antibodies (Crochet et al. Blood 2022; Iacoboni et al. Blood 2023). Here, we present a US multicenter, retrospective, case series to explore the outcomes of patients with R/R B-NHL treated with CAR T-cell therapy after prior mosunetuzumab treatment.

Methods: Patients from a Phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02500407) were included in this analysis, including patients across dose-escalation cohorts. Efficacy and safety outcomes were investigated in patients with R/R B-NHL who received CAR T-cell therapy for the first time following mosunetuzumab treatment. Eligible patients were treated with CAR T-cell therapy between March 21, 2019 and June 7, 2021.

Results: At data cut-off (May 2, 2023), 26 patients…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 26 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free