Evidence Hub

Abstract P1-06-12: Efficacy and safety of the addition of prophylactic atropine to patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer treated with sacituzumab govitecan: a Spanish multicenter real-world study

M. Echarri, Marta Santisteban, J. Cárdenas

Clinical Cancer Research, 2025

17 participants

Abstract

Background: Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a first-in-class trophoblastic antigen-2 (Trop-2)-directed antibody‒drug conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody (hRS7 IgG1κ) that recognizes Trop-2 and SN-38, a topoisomerase I inhibitor which is covalently attached to the antibody by a hydrolysable linker and results in DNA damage leading to apoptosis and cell death. SG showed a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with single-agent chemotherapy among patients with pretreated advanced triple negative (TN) and luminal HER2 negative breast cancer (BC) in the ASCENT1 and TROPiCS-022 trials, respectively. SN-38 can cause early-onset diarrhea through parasympathetic stimulation and delayed diarrhea via intestinal epithelial damage, inflammation, and dysbiosis. In clinical trials, the safety profile of SG was manageable, with febrile neutropenia (4.8%), diarrhea (3.9%), neutropenia (2.6%) and pneumonia (2%) being the most frequently reported serious adverse reactions3, causing dose reductions and treatment discontinuations. Atropine is a muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist that suppresses the parasympathetic effects of SN-38. Premedication with atropine sulfate in treatments such as SG could improve the management of severe diarrhea associated with cholinergic syndrome. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the use of prophylactic atropine to prevent diarrhea in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 17 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free