Evidence Hub

Abstract 3112: Pralsetinib induces opportunistic infection in RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients via inhibition of IL-2 production by blocking Jak3/Stat5 activation

Shinkyo Yoon, Hyun-Min Ryu, Eunjin Lee, Yunkyung Sung, Ho-Su Lee, Ji Eun Park, Chang-Hoon Lee, Seyoung Seo et al.

Cancer Research, 2025

18 participants

Abstract

Oncogenic alteration in RET, representing 1-2% of NSCLC, is an important target. Pralsetinib is a selective RET inhibitor targeting RET fusions. We present a case series on opportunistic infections and the mechanism of immunosuppression.

From October 2021 to March 2022, we administered pralsetinib to a total of 15 patients with NSCLC harboring RET fusion. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy and adverse events related to pralsetinib. To investigate pralsetinib’s impact on T-cells, we examined cytokine release using ELISA from Jurkat T (JT) cells after pralsetinib treatment. To test if Stat5 binds to the IL-2 promoter, we conducted Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP).

Out of 18 patients with measurable disease, 14 (93%) achieved a partial response. With a median follow-up duration of 8.7 months, four cases of opportunistic infections occurred. Notably, three patients (16.6%) experienced invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and one patient (5.5%) experienced cytomegalovirus pneumonia. To investigate mechanisms behind these observations, we aimed to replicate conditions similar to those of activated T cells. Thus, JT cells were treated with PMA and ionomycin to induce IL-2 release through NFAT, AP-1, and NF-κB binding to the IL-2 promoter. After ∼2 weeks of pralsetinib treatment, Jak3 signaling was inhibited, leading to decreased IL-2 release by downregulating transcription factors associated with IL-2 production, such as JunB/c-Jun and Stat5, which are downstream…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free