Evidence Hub

Outcomes of CAR T-cell therapies after prior treatment with fixed-duration mosunetuzumab in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

Adam Braun, N. Bartlett, D. Chihara, L. Nastoupil, M. Shadman, D. Tzachanis, H. Cochran, Jennifer J. Huang et al.

Blood, 2025

12 participants

Abstract

Background: Mosunetuzumab (Mosun) is a CD20xCD3 bispecific antibody (BsAb) evaluated in patients (pts) with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) in a Phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02500407). Based on this study, intravenous (IV) Mosun is approved for the treatment of pts with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior lines of systemic therapy. The optimal sequencing of available therapies and whether prior exposure to BsAbs impacts the effectiveness of subsequent CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies remain unclear. Limited data suggest that the efficacy of CAR T-cell therapies is preserved in pts with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who received prior BsAbs (Crochet et al. Blood 2024). Here, we present a US multicenter, retrospective, case series to evaluate the outcomes of pts with R/R B-NHL treated with CAR T-cell therapy after Mosun.

Methods: Pts from all dose-escalation and expansion cohorts in a Phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02500407) were included in this analysis. Efficacy and safety outcomes were investigated in pts with R/R B-NHL who received CAR T-cell therapy for the first time following Mosun treatment. Eligible pts were treated with autologous CAR T-cell therapy between December 8, 2015 and August 9, 2021.

Results: At data cut-off (May 13, 2024), 48 pts with R/R B-NHL had received CAR T-cell therapy following Mosun treatment; available data from 22 pts are presented here. Median age was 67 years (range: 52–81) and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free