Evidence Hub

Modelling migraine-related features in the nitroglycerin animal model: trigeminal hyperalgesia is associated with affective status and motor behaviour

Chiara Demartini, Rosaria Greco, Miriam Francavilla, Zanaboni Anna Maria, Cristina Tassorelli

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), 2022

Abstract

This dataset comprises the findings obtained in the study aimed at exploring the correlation between trigeminal hyperalgesia and affective status or behavioral components in a migraine-specific animal model based on nitroglycerin administration (see article Modelling migraine-related features in the nitroglycerin animal model: trigeminal hyperalgesia is associated with affective status and motor behaviour). In vivo assessments performed in male Sprague-Dawley rats four hours after treatment with nitroglycerin (10mg/kg, i.p.) or its vehicle: - in the open field test were evaluated: time spent (expressed in seconds) in the center of the apparatus as a measure of anxiety; distance (expressed in meters) travelled in the apparatus as a measure of motor behaviour; number of rearings as a measure of exploratory behaviour; time spent in grooming behavior (expressed in seconds) used as nociception index; - evaluation of trigeminal hyperalgesia in the orofacial formalin test: the face rubbing was measured counting the seconds the animal spent grooming the injected area (upper lip, lateral to the nose) with the ipsilateral forepaw or hindpaw 0–3 min (Phase I) or 12–45 min (Phase II) after formalin injection (50 µl, s.c.). The observation time was divided into 15 blocks of 3 min each. RESULTS The data analysis shows an inverse correlation between trigeminal hyperalgesia and motor or exploratory behavior, and a positive association with anxiety-like behavior of spontaneous grooming.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a dataset, done in animal, not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free