Evidence Hub

Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam for Severe Pediatric Infections: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Evidence Map

Paula Pimenta-de-Souza, Alice Ramos-Silva, Valcieny Sandes, Patrícia Portella, Thaís Gouvêa, Fernando Fernandez-Llimos, Elisangela Costa Lima

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2026

472 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The growing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (MDR-GNB) poses major challenges to the management of severe pediatric infections. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) are newer β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations with established efficacy in adults.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize current evidence on the efficacy, effectiveness, and safety of CZA and C/T in hospitalized children with severe infections.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review, meta-analysis, and evidence map (PROSPERO CRD420251025715). Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos, LILACS, SciELO, and Web of Science. Eligible designs included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, case series, and case reports evaluating CZA or C/T for complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI), complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), pneumonia, or bacteremia in patients aged 0-18 years. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes were clinical and microbiological cure and adverse events.

RESULTS

Nineteen studies (4 RCTs, 9 case series, 6 case reports) involving 472 patients were included. Sixteen studies evaluated CZA and three evaluated C/T. All RCTs were phase II, industry-sponsored, and excluded critically ill children and carbapenem-resistant infections. According to the updated RoB 2 assessment, two trials had overall low risk of bias, and two presented some concerns, mainly related to missing outcome…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 472 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free