Evidence Hub

Anxiety and Depression in Adults With Vestibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kim CH, McCray LR, Nguyen SA, Staab JP, Jafri S, Rizk H

The Laryngoscope, 2026

764,403 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To derive precise estimates of anxiety and depressive disorder prevalence in patients with common vestibular disorders.

DATA SOURCES: CINAHL, Cochrane Library, PubMed, PsycINFO, and SCOPUS.

REVIEW METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis was reported per PRISMA guidelines. Outcomes included continuous measures (mean), proportions (%), and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS: Eighty-five studies (n = 764,403) examining anxiety, depression, and vestibular disorders in adults were included. Mean ages were 50.3 (vestibular) and 46.7 (control); females comprised 63.8% and 64.3%, respectively. Patients with vestibular disorders had significantly higher rates and risks of anxiety (31.4% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.0001; RR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.1-2.0) and depression (28.3% vs. 4.7%, p < 0.0001; RR = 2.9, 95% CI: 1.8-4.4) than controls. Elevated rates were observed in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (30.6%, 23.6%), Meniere's disease (47.0%, 43.1%), vestibular migraine (46.5%, 35.7%), and vestibular neuritis (19.4%, 20.7%) (all p < 0.0001). Episodic disorders showed higher prevalence than vestibular neuritis. Patients with unspecified peripheral vestibular disorders also had significantly higher anxiety (12.1%) and depression (13.2%) rates than controls. Meta-regression revealed significant associations between Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) scores and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety and depression subscales.

CONCLUSIONS: This…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 764,403 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free