Evidence Hub

Assessing blood pressure changes and hypertension-related outcomes in patients with migraine treated with erenumab: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Makita LM, de Kleimmann RF, de Oliveira RR, Neves HAF, Corso AMS, Alves VS, Kojima GSA, Koppanatham A et al.

Headache, 2025

3 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: We aimed to systematically review and summarize evidence on the effects of erenumab on systemic blood pressure (BP) in patients with migraine (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews ID: CRD42024571056). US Prescribing Information for erenumab was updated to include the potential risk of hypertension, although randomized trials did not link it previously. The association of this monoclonal antibody with an elevated vascular risk remains uncertain.

METHODS: Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane databases were searched up to June 18, 2024 for studies examining the impact of erenumab on BP in patients with migraine. I2 statistics and prediction intervals (PIs) were applied to assess heterogeneity, and sensitivity and subgroup analyses were used to explore it. Data were collected using mean difference (MD) or proportion of events. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS: Systolic (MD = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -1.02 to 2.73, p = 0.370, I2 = 63%) and diastolic (MD = 1.33, 95% CI = -0.05 to 2.72, p = 0.060, I2 = 69%) BP measures did not significantly differ between after and before erenumab treatment. This lack of significant difference persisted at 3 and 12 months. The leave-one-out technique did not change heterogeneity. The proportion of participants presenting worsening BP appears to be 22.04% (95% CI = 11.12-38.98, PI = 0.54-93.60), with 56.40% corresponding to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free