Evidence Hub

Network meta-analysis comparing efficacy of different strategies on medication-overuse headache

Koonalintip P, Yamutai S, Setthawatcharawanich S, Thongseiratch T, Chichareon P, Wakerley BR

The journal of headache and pain, 2025

3,000 participants · 12 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medication-overuse headache (MOH) is the most common secondary headache disorder, resulting from or leading to the frequent use of acute headache medications. Despite the availability of various treatment strategies, the optimal approach remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE: This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different strategies for managing MOH, focusing on reducing monthly headache days.

METHODS: We systematically reviewed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing withdrawal strategies, including bridging therapies, the use of concurrent migraine prevention drugs, and additional education, in adult patients diagnosed with MOH. The primary outcome was the reduction in monthly headache days. Eligible studies were analyzed using a random-effects NMA model, integrating both direct and indirect evidence. Treatments were ranked using p-scores, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool 2.0.

RESULTS: Sixteen RCTs involving 3,000 participants were included. Compared to control, combination therapies, such as abrupt withdrawal with oral prevention and greater occipital nerve block and restriction of overused acute medication with oral prevention and Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) therapies, demonstrated the greatest efficacy, with reductions in monthly headache days of -10.6 (95% CI: [-15.03; -6.16]) and -8.47 (95% CI: [-12.78; -4.15]), respectively. Headache prevention strategies, including oral…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 3,000 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free