Evidence Hub

Smoking in primary headaches - a systematic review and meta-analysis

Błaszczyk B, Martynowicz H, Przegrałek J, Niemiec P, Straburzyński M, Budrewicz S, Waliszewska-Prosół M

The journal of headache and pain, 2025

10 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary headaches mainly consist of headaches such as migraine, tension-type headache (TTH), and cluster headache (CH). There is contradictory data concerning the association between smoking cigarettes and headaches. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of an association between smoking and primary headaches. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. PubMed and Scopus were screened up until February 2025. Next, those studies with eligible criteria related to this topic were included in a meta-analysis. To assess risk of bias, the Joanna Briggs Institute tool (JBI) was used. The random effects model was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and smoking prevalence. RESULTS: There were 2,713 records out of which 37 studies were included in the meta-analysis. 22 out of the 37 included studies had a low risk of bias. The prevalence of smoking in migraine was 20% (95% CI: 16–24) and in migraine with aura (MwA) 27% (95% CI%: 17–27). For TTH, the prevalence was 19% (95% CI: 7–34) and in CH, it was 65% (95% CI: 55–76). The overall smoking prevalence in primary headaches was 32% (95% CI: 8–62). Current smoking was associated with an increased risk of migraine (OR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02–1.62, p = 0.034) compared to the group without any headache. Meta-regression revealed that neither age, sex, nor year of publication influenced this result. Current smoking…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free