Evidence Hub

Prognostic factors associated with progression of open-angle glaucoma in adults

Piyasena MP, Daka Q, Qureshi R, Roberti G, Michelessi M, Liu SH, Li T, Takwoingi Y et al.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2025

6,082 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glaucoma is the leading cause of irreversible blindness globally, and the second leading cause of blindness in high-income countries. It is a chronic optic nerve disease that can lead to loss of vision, although it is usually asymptomatic until it progresses (worsens) to an advanced stage. Primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) is the most common type of glaucoma, and it is recognized as a multifactorial disorder. Pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXFG) is a common form of secondary open-angle glaucoma and has a higher rate of progression. The understanding of prognostic factors is useful for clinicians to estimate the risk of disease progression and to identify those who are at risk of losing sight early.

OBJECTIVES: To identify risk factors associated with disease progression, defined as worsening or deterioration of functional visual outcomes and/or structural outcomes, amongst adults with POAG and PXFG.

SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and two trial registries on 15 August 2024. The search was supplemented by checking reference lists of eligible articles. We did not apply any restrictions on language or year of publication.

SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials, cohort, and case-control study designs. We excluded any study with less than two years of follow-up and a sample size of < 200. The targeted population consisted of adults ≥ 18 years of age of any sex with glaucoma type restricted to POAG, normal-tension…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 6,082 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free