Evidence Hub

Abstract 4998: Pralsetinib induces opportunistic infection in RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients via inhibition of IL-2 production by blocking Jak3-Stat5 activation

Shinkyo Yoon, Hyun-Min Ryu, Sang-We Kim, Kang-Seo Park, D. Lee

Cancer Research, 2024

18 participants

Abstract

Background: Oncogenic alteration in RET, representing 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is one of the important targets. Pralsetinib is a selective RET inhibitor that targets RET fusions. We present a case series on opportunistic infections and the mechanism of immunosuppression.

Methods: From October 2021 to March 2022, we administered pralsetinib to a total of 15 patients with NSCLC harboring RET fusion. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy and adverse event related to pralsetinib. To investigate the potential impact of pralsetinib on T-cells, we examined cytokine release from Jurkat T (JT) cells after pralsetinib treatment. To test if Stat5 bind to IL-2 promotor, we conducted Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP).

Results: Out of a total of 18 patients with measurable disease, 14 patients (93%) achieved a partial response. With the median follow-up duration of 8.7 months, four cases of opportunistic infections were occurred. Notably, three patients (16.6%) experienced invasive pulmonary aspergillosis, and one patient (5.5%) experienced cytomegalovirus pneumonia. To mimic conditions akin to activated T cells, we treated JT cells with PMA and ionomycin, inducing IL-2 release through the binding of NFAT, AP-1, and NF-κB to the IL-2 promoter. Following approximately two weeks of pralsetinib treatment, a decrease of IL-2 releases, the inhibition of Jak3 and the reduced-expression of JunB and c-Jun was observed. Additionally, to investigate the direct…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 18 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free