Evidence Hub

Systematic review and meta-analysis of Tanacetum parthenium: evaluating its efficacy in migraine relief

Vineet Nelaturi, G. Viswanatha, R. R. Shenoy, Saumya Khanna, N. Krishnadas

Natural Product Research, 2025

899 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium) has been evaluated in multiple clinical studies for migraine management, with earlier meta-analyses suggesting therapeutic potential. Given recent randomised controlled trials (RCTs), this updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess feverfew's efficacy in reducing migraine frequency, severity, and associated symptoms. A comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar up to August 2025 identified nine double-masked, placebo-controlled RCTs involving 899 participants. Feverfew significantly reduced migraine attack frequency (IV: -1.11 [-1.23 to -0.99], p < 0.00001; I2 = 28%), migraine duration (IV: -4.43 [-7.63, -1.23] at 95% CI, p = 0.007; I2 = 98% and showed a non-significant trend towards reduced pain severity (IV: -0.63 [-1.48 to 0.21], p = 0.14; I2 = 85%). No significant effects were observed on migraine associated symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, photophobia, and phonophobia. Moderate heterogeneity, risks of selection, and attrition bias limited the overall quality of the evidence. Feverfew may offer modest benefits in migraine prevention, warranting further high-quality, large-scale RCTs with standardised protocols.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 899 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free