Evidence Hub

Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

G. Lippi

Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital Medical Journal, 2025

1,240 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Migraine is a prevalent and disabling neurological disorder with a complex and partially understood pathophysiology. Red blood cell distribution width (RDW), a routine hematological parameter, has emerged as a potential biomarker of systemic inflammation, which may be relevant in migraine. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting RDW values in individuals with and without migraine. Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science) and Google Scholar were searched through June 23, 2025. Inclusion criteria comprised case-control studies comparing RDW in migraineurs and healthy controls. Results: Five case-control studies comprising 1,240 participants (709 with migraine and 531 without) met the inclusion criteria. RDW values were higher in migraine patients in four of the five studies. The overall pooled weighted mean difference (WMD) in RDW was 0.24 (95% CI: −0.15 to 0.62; I²=97%). After excluding one outlier study, the WMD increased to 0.47 (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.76). Discussion and Conclusion: Our findings suggest a trend toward elevated RDW in individuals with migraine. While promising, the results are limited by high heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies across studies, underscoring the need for further standardized research.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,240 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free