Evidence Hub

Intravenous Immunoglobulin Therapy in ICU-Managed Guillain–Barré Syndrome: Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes

Hemant Toshikhane, Ami Patel, Dharmesh L. Chauhan, Misbah Rangwala, H. Daga

International Journal of Drug Delivery Technology, 2026

15 participants

Abstract

Background: Guillain–Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute immune-mediated polyradiculoneuropathy

characterized by rapidly progressive weakness and variable clinical severity, frequently necessitating intensive

care support. Axonal variants, particularly in Indian populations, are associated with more severe disease, higher

ventilatory requirements, and poorer outcomes. Despite the established efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin

(IVIG), morbidity and mortality remain significant among critically ill patients.

Objectives: To evaluate the demographic profile, clinical characteristics, electrophysiological subtypes, intensive

care course, and in-hospital outcomes of adult patients with GBS treated with IVIG in a tertiary-care intensive

care unit.

Methods: A retrospective observational case series was conducted from January to December 2025 in the ICU of

a tertiary-care center. Adult patients (≥18 years) meeting Brighton diagnostic criteria (Levels 1–3) and treated

with standard IVIG therapy (0.4 g/kg/day for 5 days) were included. Data on demographics, antecedent events,

clinical presentation, electrophysiological subtype, need for mechanical ventilation, ICU duration, complications,

and outcomes were analyzed using descriptive statistics.

Results: A total of 15 patients were included (mean age: 35.5 years; 66.7% male). Antecedent infections were

identified in 73.3% of cases. The predominant electrophysiological subtype was Acute Motor Axonal Neuropathy

(53.3%), followed by Acute…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 15 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free