Evidence Hub

Non-pharmacological interventions for the prevention of migraine in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alhassan H. Hobani, A. Hamadah, A. Taheri, Ibrahim Alsam, Fuad Khawaji, Laura Damanhouri, Salman Alshams, Mohammad Alnejaidi et al.

International Journal of Medicine in Developing Countries, 2025

Abstract

Migraine is a common and debilitating neurological condition. The limitations of drug-based preventive measures, such as insufficient effectiveness and poor tolerability, highlight the necessity for alternative prevention methods. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the safety and efficacy of non-drug interventions aimed at preventing migraines in adults. Following PRISMA guidelines, this review conducted a comprehensive search of various databases from their inception until 2025 to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and observational studies. Key outcomes measured were migraine frequency, intensity, disability levels, quality of life indicators, and medication usage. A total of ten studies were included indicating a non-significant decrease in the number of migraine days (mean difference [MD] = -1.06 per month; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -2.41 to 0.29) and pain intensity (MD = -1.40; 95% CI: -3.51 to 0.71), both exhibiting considerable heterogeneity (I² = 99%). Conversely, there was a statistically significant reduction in acute medication usage (MD = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.49; P = 0.003) with negligible heterogeneity (I² = 0%). A non-significant trend suggested that non-pharmacological interventions might favorably impact achieving a ≥50% reduction in headache frequency (odds ratio [OR] = 1.77; 95% CI: 0.77 to 4.10). Importantly, these interventions were well-tolerated without a significant increase in adverse events…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free