Evidence Hub

Immunotherapy in Bellini Duct Carcinoma: A Systematic Review

A. Lázaro-Sánchez, J. Benítez-Fuentes, Sofía Wikström-Fernández, María Nevado-Rodríguez, P. Conesa-Zamora, G. Luengo-Gil, Alejandra Ivars-Rubio, M. Zafra-Poves et al.

Oncology Research, 2026

16 participants

Abstract

Background: Collecting duct carcinoma (CDC; Bellini duct carcinoma) is a rare, aggressive renal cancer with no established standard of care, and evidence for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapy in CDC remains emerging and fragmented. We aimed to systematically synthesise efficacy and safety data on immunotherapy in adult patients with CDC. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science were searched from inception to 29 March 2025, with targeted post-search monitoring of key journals and ClinicalTrials.gov updated on 11 April 2026. Prospective interventional studies, observational cohorts/registries, and case series/reports were eligible. Screening, extraction and risk-of-bias appraisal (Joanna Briggs Institute tools) were performed independently in duplicate; results were narratively synthesised. Results: Overall, ICIs—particularly combinations—showed clinically meaningful activity in a subset of CDC patients. Twenty-four studies met criteria (2 prospective trials, 8 observational cohorts, 14 case-level publications/16 patients). The SUNNIFORECAST randomised phase II trial reported a CDC-specific ORR of 40% with ipilimumab + nivolumab versus 20% with standard of care (n = 9 CDC). Observational evidence yielded ORR ~10–44% and mOS ~13–42 months depending on regimen, with the highest activity seen with ICI plus TKI combinations. Durable complete responses (≥3–6 years) were documented at case level with dual checkpoint blockade and anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Safety was generally…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 16 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free