Evidence Hub

Evaluating the Bidirectional Causal Effects of Alzheimer's Disease Across Multiple Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mendelian Randomization Studies

Zhu H, Ni H, Yang Q, Ni J, Ji J, Yang S, Peng F

International journal of molecular sciences, 2025

13 citations

Abstract

This study systematically evaluates and meta-analyzes Mendelian randomization studies on the bidirectional causal relationship between Alzheimer's disease (AD) and systemic diseases. We searched five databases, assessed study quality, and extracted data. Diseases were classified using ICD-11, and the meta-analysis was performed with RevMan 5.4. A total of 56 studies identified genetic links between AD susceptibility and systemic diseases. Notably, genetic proxies for hip osteoarthritis (OR = 0.80; p = 0.007) and rheumatoid arthritis (OR = 0.97; p = 0.004) were inversely associated with AD risk, while gout (OR = 1.02; p = 0.049) showed a positive association. Genetic liability to depression (OR = 1.03; p = 0.001) elevated AD risk, and AD genetic risk increased susceptibility to delirium (OR = 1.32; p = 0.0005). Cardiovascular traits, including coronary artery disease (OR = 1.07; p = 0.021) and hypertension (OR = 4.30; p = 0.044), were causally linked to a higher AD risk. Other conditions, such as insomnia, chronic periodontitis, migraine, and certain cancers, exhibited significant genetic correlations. Intriguingly, herpes zoster (OR = 0.87; p = 0.005) and cataracts (OR = 0.96; p = 0.012) demonstrated inverse genetic associations with AD. These findings suggest potential therapeutic targets and preventive strategies, emphasizing the need to address comorbid systemic diseases to reduce AD risk and progression.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free