Evidence Hub

Noradrenergic system involvement as a major driver of tension-type headache: a systematic review of the current evidence

Braca S, Cretella G, Deligianni C, Kennelly L, Tseriotis VS, Andreou AP, Mitsikostas DD, Mavridis T

The journal of headache and pain, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tension-type headache (TTH) is the most prevalent primary headache disorder, affecting individuals of all ages and imposing a substantial global burden. While traditionally considered a peripheral skeletomuscular condition, current evidence suggests a prominent role for central mechanisms and neurotransmitter dysregulation. In this context, growing evidence highlights the noradrenergic system as a key contributor, both for the TTH genesis and maintenance. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE via Scopus up to March 2024 identified studies examining the relationship between TTH and the noradrenergic system. RESULTS: Forty-three eligible studies were included and categorized according to their focus on pathophysiology or treatment. Biochemical studies consistently reported reduced noradrenergic activity, including reduced plasma norepinephrine/epinephrine levels and dopamine-β-hydroxylase activity in TTH patients, often correlating with headache severity and chronicity. Neurophysiological and autonomic investigations further supported noradrenergic involvement, revealing altered reflex suppression, impaired sympathetic habituation, and reduced central autonomic responsiveness in TTH. Pharmacological studies indicated that medication enhancing noradrenergic transmission achieved superior clinical efficacy compared to those acting on the serotonergic system only.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free