Evidence Hub

Effects of combining manual therapies, neck muscle exercises, and therapeutic education pain neuroscience in patients with migraine: a 3-armed randomized clinical trial

Tolentino GA, Florencio LL, Pradela J, Pinheiro-Araújo CF, Martins J, de Cassia Cabral Norato A, Sambini FD, Malosti Teodoro Rodrigues JL et al.

Musculoskeletal science & practice, 2025

7 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical therapy is a non-pharmacological approach for migraine management. However, the effectiveness of a multimodal approach combining manual therapies, cervical exercises, and therapeutic education, compared to these interventions individually, remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

to investigate the effects of a multimodal approach versus manual therapies or pain neuroscience education alone in migraine patients.

METHODS

A three-arm, parallel, single-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted over 12 weeks, with assessments at baseline, 4, 8, and 12 weeks, and follow-up assessments at 1, 2, and 4 months. Seventy-five participants were randomly allocated to the Therapeutic Education Pain Neuroscience Group (TEG), Manual Therapies Group (MTG), or Multimodal Group (MUG). The primary outcome was the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Secondary outcomes included headache frequency, intensity, and duration; neck disability index (NDI); Allodynia Symptom Checklist (ASC-12); maladaptive beliefs; pain catastrophizing; quality of life; dizziness; and cervical assessments. Mixed models were analyzed in SPSS, considering group, time, and group-by-time interactions.

RESULTS

All groups demonstrated significant HIT-6 improvement (p < 0.001). MTG showed greater improvement at week 4, while TEG surpassed MTG by week 12. At follow-up, MUG demonstrated superior reduction in headache impact. Significant group-by-time interactions favored multimodal treatment for headache frequency,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free