Evidence Hub

Long-term safety of cyclical rozanolixizumab in patients with generalized myasthenia gravis: Results from the Phase 3 MycarinG study and an open-label extension

Habib AA, Drużdż A, Grosskreutz J, Mantegazza R, Sacconi S, Utsugisawa K, Vu T, Vissing J et al.

Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2025

188 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) is a rare, chronic, fluctuating and heterogeneous autoimmune disease requiring lifelong treatment. The Phase 3 MycarinG study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of one 6-week cycle of weekly rozanolixizumab in adult patients with gMG. Open-label extension studies demonstrated consistent symptom improvement over additional treatment cycles.

OBJECTIVE: To present findings from pooled analyses on the long-term safety of repeated cycles of rozanolixizumab.

METHODS: Data from the Phase 3 randomized MycarinG study (NCT03971422) and the ongoing open-label extension study MG0007 (NCT04650854) were pooled to assess safety outcomes during cyclical treatment, including incidence of any treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), severe TEAEs, serious TEAEs and TEAEs leading to discontinuations. Additional analyses were performed for TEAEs, including headache, infections, and hypersensitivity reactions.

RESULTS: At data cutoff (July 8, 2022), a total of 188 patients in MycarinG and MG0007 had received ≥1 treatment cycle with rozanolixizumab; total time in studies was 174.71 patient-years. Overall, 169/188 (89.9%) patients experienced any TEAE: 89/188 (47.3%) experienced any headache (including migraine, migraine with aura); 85/188 (45.2%) experienced an infection; 25/188 (13.3%) experienced a hypersensitivity reaction. One patient experienced an event of aseptic meningitis. The majority of AEs were mild-to-moderate in intensity, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 188 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free