Evidence Hub

The Efficacy and Safety of Electroacupuncture for Prophylaxis of Menstrually Related Migraine: Study Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Xin-Kun Liu, Rui-Min Jiao, Yaqing Zheng, Yan Liu, Guang-Xian Yu, Jia-Xiang Shi, Wei Wang, Wei-Ming Wang

International Journal of Women's Health, 2025

40 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background Acupuncture, a well-established non-pharmacological intervention, has displayed promise in migraine management, but high-quality evidence for its effectiveness in menstrually related migraine (MRM) prophylaxis remains scarce. This pilot randomized controlled trial will evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) for MRM prevention and provide evidence-based support for future large-scale trials. Methods/Design This single-center, participant- and assessor-blinded, sham-controlled pilot trial will assign 40 eligible patients with MRM in a 1:1 ratio to the EA or sham EA (SEA) group via block randomization. Participants will begin treatment on day −3 of each menstrual cycle (estimated according to the previous cycle), receiving 1–2 sessions during the first week (from day −3 to +4 of menstruation) and 2–3 sessions per week for the following 3 weeks. The intervention period will last 12 weeks and total 30 sessions, followed by 12 weeks of follow-up. The primary outcome is the change from baseline in standardized monthly headache days (SMHDs) at week 12. Secondary outcomes include the MRM cure rate, responder rate for MRM (≥50% reduction in SMHDs), changes in headache severity and medication use, quality of life (Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire v2.1), psychological status (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), headache-related disability (Headache Impact Test-6), global impression of change (Patient’s Global Impression of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 40 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free