Evidence Hub

The effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy comorbid with migraine on the EEG power spectrum: a randomized controlled trial

Shuai Ma, Jinyuan Du, Cheng Luo, Xiao Wu, Linli Liu, Ting-Ting Liu, Xin Zhang, Lili Yang et al.

Frontiers in Neurology, 2025

20 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background Migraine is a common comorbidity in patients with epilepsy, with a comorbidity rate ranging from 9.3 to 34.7%. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging therapy used in both epilepsy and migraine treatment. However, there are currently no randomized controlled studies (RCTs) using taVNS for epilepsy complicated with migraine. Objective In this study, we evaluated the effect of taVNS as an adjuvant therapy on patients with comorbid epilepsy and migraine. Methods Forty comorbid patients (taVNS n = 20, tanVNS n = 20) were recruited and randomly grouped. The taVNS group received the true stimulus, whereas the tanVNS group received a pseudostimulus. Outcome assessment was performed at baseline and 24 weeks after initiation. We used t-test and non-parametric tests to analyse the data. Results The frequencies of migraine attacks and seizures significantly decreased in the taVNS group from baseline to 24 weeks (migraine attack frequency, p = 0.002; seizure frequency, p = 0.004), and so did in Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) score (p < 0.001) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) score (p < 0.001). The QOLIE-31 scores increased after 24 weeks of taVNS treatment (p = 0.028). Moreover, taVNS reduced the EEG power spectrum in four frequency bands at 16 electrode locations in comparison between groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion In comorbid patients in our groups, taVNS can decrease the frequency of seizures, improve mood and quality of life, and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 20 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free