Evidence Hub

Role of Subcutaneous Adrenaline in Reducing Bleeding Risks During Chest Drain Insertion in High-Risk Patients: A Case Report

Joshua Martin Manogaran, M. Ibrahim

Cureus, 2025

Abstract

The vasoconstrictive effect of adrenaline combined with lidocaine is well-documented, but its efficacy in reducing procedure-related bleeding during chest drain insertion in coagulopathic patients remains unreported. We present the case of a 37-year-old male with alcohol-related decompensated liver cirrhosis (Child-Pugh C), thrombocytopenia (23,000 × 10⁹/L), and elevated INR (2.3), who developed a spontaneous right hydropneumothorax secondary to cavitary pneumonia. Despite profound coagulopathy, a lifesaving 18F Seldinger chest drain was inserted using adrenaline-lidocaine (1:200,000) for local anesthesia, achieving immediate hemostasis with no periprocedural bleeding. This highlights the potential role of adrenaline in mitigating bleeding risks during invasive procedures in high-risk patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free